Premises Liability Case against Automax for Paul Harvey:

Premises Liability Case against Automax for Paul Harvey:

Duty of Care
Automax had a duty of care to ensure safety for their patrons that are on their grounds/premises. They failed to minimize possible danger that could result in harm to their patrons.

Breach of Duty
Automax failed to maintain that duty on the basis of negligence. Automax had knowledge of this dangerous area on their premises that they failed to remedy. 

Breach of Duty Causes Injury
Automax breached that duty, resulting in my brain and hearing injury! This breach of duty was responsible for my injuries.

PAUL HARVEY SEEKS LEGAL REPRESENTATION AGAINST AUTOMAX!! 

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on reddit
Share on vk
Share on tumblr
Share on mix
Share on pocket
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

More Interesting Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *